Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_211717 AI generated

Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible in dispute over salary payment as dare or facere.

Case Number ICCJ_211717
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a referral from the Alba Tribunal (Civil Section I) seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Articles 652(1) and 781 of the Romanian Civil Procedure Code, specifically whether the obligation of the Ministry of Public Finance, as debtor under enforceable titles (court judgments granting salary rights to justice personnel), to allocate funds for payment constitutes an obligation to give (a dare) or an obligation to do (a facere). The court rejected the referral without addressing the merits, finding that the procedural conditions for the preliminary ruling mechanism were not met, and rendered the decision binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible in dispute over salary payment as dare or facere: The court rejected the referral without addressing the merits, finding that the procedural conditions for the preliminary ruling mechanism were not met, and rendered the decision binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision civil judgment enforceable decision procedural rights public finance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to declare that the decision is binding.
AI generated
ICCJ_230685
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible; prior salary-law decision stands
ICCJ_230276
Referral for preliminary ruling on salary rights of suspended public servants inadmissible.
ICCJ_127715
Salary referral deemed inadmissible as abstract; pay dispute returns to lower court
ICCJ_138452
Salary-payment execution challenge referral deemed inadmissible, no preliminary ruling issued
ICCJ_226582
Preliminary salary-calculation referral inadmissible; lower court decision stands.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to declare that the decision is binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 2 Dosar nr. 2627/1/2023

Ședința din 29 ianuarie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de către Tribunalul Alba – Secţia I civilă privind dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Modalitatea de interpretare a dispoziţiilor art. 652 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă, respectiv ale art. 781 din Codul de procedură civilă, cu privire la natura obligaţiei debitorului Ministerul Finanţelor Publice, cuprinsă în titlurile executorii reprezentate de hotărâri judecătoreşti având ca obiect acordarea unor drepturi salariale personalului din justiţie, respectiv dacă obligaţia de a aloca fondurile necesare plăţii reprezintă o obligaţie de a da sau o obligaţie de a face.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 29 ianuarie 2024.