Denial of jurisdiction transfer for lack of legitimate suspicion under Article 140(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the motion to transfer jurisdiction filed by a limited liability company, thereby denying the applicant's request and leaving the case with the Court of Appeal in its original location. The dispute concerned a procedural application for the removal of a case in administrative and fiscal litigation from the Court of Appeal of Timișoara, Section of Administrative and Fiscal Disputes, to a different court. The court's decisive legal basis was the determination that there was no legitimate suspicion of partiality or bias, as defined in Article 140(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which is the statutory requirement for granting a transfer of jurisdiction.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 140 alin. (2) din C. proc. civ; Denial of jurisdiction transfer for lack of legitimate suspicion under Article 140(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta A. S.R.L. privind strămutarea dosarului nr. x/2022 aflat pe rolul Curţii de Apel Timişoara, secţia contencios administrativ şi fiscal.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Şedinţa publică din data de 26 octombrie 2023 din camera de consiliu
Apreciind că nu există motive de bănuială legitimă, în sensul dispoziţiilor art. 140 alin. (2) din C. proc. civ., urmează a respinge cererea de strămutare.
Pentru aceste motive,
D I S P U N E
Respinge cererea formulată de petenta A. S.R.L. privind strămutarea dosarului nr. x/2022 aflat pe rolul Curţii de Apel Timişoara, secţia contencios administrativ şi fiscal.
Definitivă.
Pronunţată astăzi, 26 octombrie 2023, prin punerea soluţiei la dispoziţia părţilor prin mijlocirea grefei instanţei.