Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1572/2023 AI generated

Venue transfer granted from Sighetu Marmației to Baia Mare Court, prior acts upheld, no appeal.

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1572/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice granted the applicant's motion to change venue, ordering the case to be transferred from the Sighetu Marmației Court to the Baia Mare Court while upholding all prior procedural acts, with no appeal available. The application sought venue transfer for a case pending before the lower court, invoking Article 40(4) of the 1865 Code of Civil Procedure concerning forum non conveniens or risk of partiality. The decision was issued in a public sitting on 11 October 2023, finalizing the transfer and confirming the procedural validity of earlier steps.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ, art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ. din 1865; Venue transfer granted from Sighetu Marmației to Baia Mare Court, prior acts upheld, no appeal: The application sought venue transfer for a case pending before the lower court, invoking Article 40(4) of the 1865 Code of Civil Procedure concerning forum non conveniens or risk of partiality. The decision was issued in a public sitting on 11 October 2023, finalizing the transfer and confirming the procedural validity of earlier steps.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code Roman law procedural issues transfer of tenancy grounds for cassation change of precedent

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ
Reţinând dispoziţiile art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ.
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ. din 1865
Main basis for granting the request for transfer of the case to another court.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 63/2013
Venue transfer granted; case moved from Satu Mare Tribunal to Cluj Tribunal with prior acts preserved.
Încheierea nr. 5378/2012
Transfer of venue granted: Case moved from Satu Mare to Cluj-Napoca court
Încheierea nr. 6898/2012
Transfer of venue granted from Satu Mare to Argeș Tribunal; prior acts preserved.
Încheierea nr. 201/2014
Change of venue granted and case transferred from Ploiești to Pitești Court of Appeal, prior acts preserved.
Încheierea nr. 351/2017
Case transfer from Sighetu Marmației to Oradea Court granted, procedural acts preserved.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ. din 1865

Main basis for granting the request for transfer of the case to another court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Şedinţa publică din data de 11 octombrie 2023

Reţinând dispoziţiile art. 40 alin. (4) C. proc. civ. din 1865,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DISPUNE:

Admite cererea formulată de petentul A. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul dosarului nr. x/2021 al Judecătoriei Sighetu Marmaţiei.

Strămută judecata cauzei de la Judecătoria Sighetu Marmaţiei la Judecătoria Baia Mare.

Menţine actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 11 octombrie 2023.