Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_207904 AI generated

Entitlement of Personal Assistants to Hazardous Conditions Wage Premium Under Social Assistance and Framework Labor Regulations

Case Number ICCJ_207904
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the interest of the law filed by the Presiding Council of the Alba-Iulia Court of Appeal, establishing a binding interpretation for unified judicial practice. The case concerned a dispute over the entitlement of a personal care assistant to a wage premium for hazardous or harmful working conditions, challenging the application of specific social assistance and labor regulation provisions. The Court ruled that a personal assistant does not benefit from the hazardous or harmful conditions premium, based on the unified interpretation and application of Article 37 of Law No. 448/2006 and Annex No. 9, point IV, letter A, subpoint 2 of Government Decision No. 153/2018, which approves the framework regulation on job positions and wage premiums under Law No. 153/2017.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 37 din Legea nr. 448/2006, art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Entitlement of Personal Assistants to Hazardous Conditions Wage Premium Under Social Assistance and Framework Labor Regulations: The case concerned a dispute over the entitlement of a personal care assistant to a wage premium for hazardous or harmful working conditions, challenging the application of specific social assistance and labor regulation provisions. The Court ruled that a personal assistant does not benefit from the hazardous or harmful conditions premium, based on the unified interpretation and application of Article 37 of Law No. 448/2006 and Annex No. 9, point IV, letter A, subpoint 2 of Government Decision No. 153/2018, which approves the framework regulation on job positions and wage premiums under Law No. 153/2017.

Keywords

AI generated
entitlement condition for benefits working conditions social assistance persons covered by the regulations judicial law public employment law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 37 din Legea nr. 448/2006
Substantive provision cited as the main ground for the verdict, determining the ineligibility of the personal assistant for the hazardous conditions premium.
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision and the obligation to follow the unified interpretation.
AI generated
ICCJ_211726
Exclusion of personal assistants from hazardous working conditions allowance under Law 448/2006 and Government Decision 153/2018
ICCJ_220631
Entitlement and quantification of hazardous condition allowances for public sector health personnel under Law 153/2017 and Government Decision 153/2018.
Decizia nr. 398/2025
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on personal assistant wages and hazardous work surcharges under OUG 62/2024
Decizia nr. 147/2025
Personal assistant's entitlement to public sector vacation vouchers despite disability care legislation scope
Decizia nr. 33/2025
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on overtime premiums for personal care assistants in Law No. 448/2006

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 37 din Legea nr. 448/2006

Substantive provision cited as the main ground for the verdict, determining the ineligibility of the personal assistant for the hazardous conditions premium.

Anexa nr. 9 pct. IV lit. A, subpunctul 2 din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 153/2018

Substantive provision cited as the main ground for the verdict, defining the specific job categories and wage premiums applicable under the framework regulation.

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision and the obligation to follow the unified interpretation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 23 Dosar nr. 2391/1/2023

Şedinţa din 27 noiembrie 2023

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Alba-Iulia şi, în consecinţă:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 37 din Legea nr. 448/2006 şi a prevederilor Anexei nr. 9 pct. IV lit. A, subpunctul 2 din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 153/2018 pentru aprobarea Regulamentului-cadru privind stabilirea locurilor de muncă, a categoriilor de personal, a mărimii concrete a sporului pentru condiţii de muncă prevăzut în Anexa nr. II la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017, stabileşte că asistentul personal nu beneficiază de sporul pentru condiţii periculoase sau vătămătoare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 noiembrie 2023.