Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_206196 AI generated

Admissibility of assimilating a demolition-ordered injured party to a confiscation-owning injured party under contravention law via civil code analogy

Case Number ICCJ_206196
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling on a question of law filed by the Arad Court of Appeal, leaving the lower court to resolve the underlying labor and insurance social case without a unifying Supreme Court interpretation. The dispute concerned whether an injured party, distinct from the contravenor, who ordered the demolition of a structure via a contravention report, could be assimilated to an injured party owning confiscated goods under Romanian law. The court’s decision relied on procedural admissibility standards, specifically citing Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, to reject the referral rather than substantively interpreting the interaction between Article 31(2) of Government Ordinance No. 2/2001 on the legal regime of contraventions and Article 1(2) of the Civil Code regarding legal analogy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of assimilating a demolition-ordered injured party to a confiscation-owning injured party under contravention law via civil code analogy: The dispute concerned whether an injured party, distinct from the contravenor, who ordered the demolition of a structure via a contravention report, could be assimilated to an injured party owning confiscated goods under Romanian law. The court’s decision relied on procedural admissibility standards, specifically citing Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, to reject the referral rather than substantively interpreting the interaction between Article 31(2) of Government Ordinance No. 2/2001 on the legal regime of contraventions and Article 1(2) of the Civil Code regarding legal analogy.

Keywords

AI generated
demolition order Civil Procedure Code interpretation of the law preliminary ruling procedure misuse of a right procedural orders

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to determine that the court's decision is mandatory and binding on the seizing court.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2051/2020
Artificial accession: temporal application of Civil Code and right to compel demolition vs. purchase of land occupied by public building
Decizia nr. 73/2023
Injured co-owner's demolition-order challenge deemed inadmissible referral, prior standing rejection stands.
Decizia nr. 2365/2017
Revision of demolition-order claim inadmissible for lack of identical parties and cause
Decizia nr. 2141/2005
Post-seizure property restitution: Inadmissibility of civil code claim due to mandatory pre-action administrative procedure under special reparative law
Decizia nr. 5073/2013
Admissibility of civil ownership claim for abusively seized property versus mandatory special restitution procedure under Law 10/2001

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to determine that the court's decision is mandatory and binding on the seizing court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 73 Dosar nr. 1861/1/2023

Ședința de la 30 octombrie 2023

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Arad - Secţia a III-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal, litigii de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în Dosarul nr. 12.395/55/2022, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Persoana vătămată, alta decât contravenientul, căreia i s-a dispus demolarea construcţiei prin procesul verbal de contravenţie, poate fi asimilată persoanei vătămate căreia îi aparţin bunurile confiscate în sensul art. 31 alin. (2) teza a II-a din Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 2/2001 privind regimul juridic al contravenţiilor, prin analogia reglementată de art. 1 alin. (2) din Codul civil?”

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 30 octombrie 2023.