Denial of transfer of jurisdiction under Art. 40(1)(4) CPC due to statutory requirement of unreasoned orders
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the request for the transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) filed by the plaintiff, ruling that the court of first instance proceedings for Case No. x/2008 would remain with the Court of Appeal Galați; the decision is final and not subject to appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural motion by the claimant to move the case to a different judicial body, likely due to grounds of partiality or procedural impediment, challenging the validity of the current forum. The court’s operative decision was based strictly on Article 40(1)(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, which mandates that the ruling on a transfer of jurisdiction be issued without reasoning, thereby closing the procedural pathway for the transfer application.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 40 alin. (1) pct. 4 C. proc. civ; Denial of transfer of jurisdiction under Art. 40(1)(4) CPC due to statutory requirement of unreasoned orders: Respinge cererea privind strămutarea dosarului nr. x/2008 al Curţii de Apel Galaţi, secţia I civilă, formulată de petenta A. S.R.L.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Şedinţa publică din data de 8 iunie 2023
Având în vedere dispoziţiile art. 40 alin. (1) pct. 4 C. proc. civ., potrivit cărora "încheierea asupra strămutării se dă fără motivare",
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DISPUNE:
Respinge cererea privind strămutarea dosarului nr. x/2008 al Curţii de Apel Galaţi, secţia I civilă, formulată de petenta A. S.R.L.
Fără cale de atac.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 8 iunie 2023.