Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_185456 AI generated

Preliminary ruling referral on revision against merits-lacking final decision held inadmissible.

Case Number ICCJ_185456
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as a panel for the preliminary ruling on questions of law in criminal matters, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Timișoara Court of Appeal, meaning the referral was rejected and no ruling on the underlying legal question was issued. The referral sought a preliminary ruling on whether, under Article 452(1) of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, a request for revision based on Article 453(1)(e) of the same Code may be directed against a final criminal decision that does not resolve the merits of the criminal action. The dismissal was based on procedural admissibility grounds, as the decision is binding from publication in the Official Gazette pursuant to Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală; Preliminary ruling referral on revision against merits-lacking final decision held inadmissible: The referral sought a preliminary ruling on whether, under Article 452(1) of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, a request for revision based on Article 453(1)(e) of the same Code may be directed against a final criminal decision that does not resolve the merits of the criminal action. The dismissal was based on procedural admissibility grounds, as the decision is binding from publication in the Official Gazette pursuant to Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure revision in criminal matters preliminary decision grounds for cassation procedural issues e-justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală
Basis for the binding effect of the decision from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală

Basis for the binding effect of the decision from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr.2 Dosar nr.2749/1/2021

Şedinţa din data de 27 ianuarie 2022

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Timișoara, Secţia Penală în dosarul nr. 392/30/2021 prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea de principiu a următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă în interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 452 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură penală o cerere de revizuire întemeiată pe dispoziţiile art. 453 alin. (1) lit. e) din Codul de procedură penală poate fi îndreptată şi împotriva unei hotărâri penale definitive, dar care nu soluţionează fondul acţiunii penale.”

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 ianuarie 2022.