Preliminary ruling referral on revision against merits-lacking final decision held inadmissible.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as a panel for the preliminary ruling on questions of law in criminal matters, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Timișoara Court of Appeal, meaning the referral was rejected and no ruling on the underlying legal question was issued. The referral sought a preliminary ruling on whether, under Article 452(1) of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, a request for revision based on Article 453(1)(e) of the same Code may be directed against a final criminal decision that does not resolve the merits of the criminal action. The dismissal was based on procedural admissibility grounds, as the decision is binding from publication in the Official Gazette pursuant to Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală; Preliminary ruling referral on revision against merits-lacking final decision held inadmissible: The referral sought a preliminary ruling on whether, under Article 452(1) of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure, a request for revision based on Article 453(1)(e) of the same Code may be directed against a final criminal decision that does not resolve the merits of the criminal action. The dismissal was based on procedural admissibility grounds, as the decision is binding from publication in the Official Gazette pursuant to Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedBasis for the binding effect of the decision from the date of publication in the Official Gazette.
Full text
R O M Â N I A
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ
Minuta deciziei nr.2 Dosar nr.2749/1/2021
Şedinţa din data de 27 ianuarie 2022
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D E C I D E:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Timișoara, Secţia Penală în dosarul nr. 392/30/2021 prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea de principiu a următoarei chestiuni de drept:
„Dacă în interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 452 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură penală o cerere de revizuire întemeiată pe dispoziţiile art. 453 alin. (1) lit. e) din Codul de procedură penală poate fi îndreptată şi împotriva unei hotărâri penale definitive, dar care nu soluţionează fondul acţiunii penale.”
Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 ianuarie 2022.