Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Decizia nr. 1495/2020 AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction due to legitimate suspicion of bias under Article 37(2) of the Civil Procedure Code

Case Number Decizia nr. 1495/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Criminal and Civil Division) granted the request for a transfer of venue, ordering that the case be moved from the Suceava Court of Appeal to the Iași Court of Appeal for continuation, while preserving the procedural acts already completed; this non-appealable decision was issued at the request of the Suceava Court of Appeal regarding a pending administrative-fiscal lawsuit originally registered before the Suceava Court of First Instance. The dispute involved a challenge to the proper jurisdiction or neutrality of the original tribunal, prompting the higher court to intervene to ensure a fair trial. The decisive legal basis was Article 37(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, which allows for the transfer of a case when there are legitimate grounds for suspicion or bias against the designated judicial body.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 37 alin. (2) C. proc. civ; Transfer of jurisdiction due to legitimate suspicion of bias under Article 37(2) of the Civil Procedure Code: The dispute involved a challenge to the proper jurisdiction or neutrality of the original tribunal, prompting the higher court to intervene to ensure a fair trial. The decisive legal basis was Article 37(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, which allows for the transfer of a case when there are legitimate grounds for suspicion or bias against the designated judicial body.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction Civil Procedure Code legitimate suspicion of bias judicial bias fair trial non-administrative dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 37 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

The provision explicitly cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for admitting the request and ordering the transfer of the case due to legitimate suspicion.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Şedinţa publică din data de 10 martie 2020

Apreciind că există motive de bănuială legitimă, în sensul dispoziţiilor art. 37 alin. (2) C. proc. civ. (1865),

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta CURTEA DE APEL SUCEAVA privind strămutarea dosarului nr. x/2007 aflat pe rolul Tribunalului Suceava, secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal.

Strămută judecata cauzei la Tribunalul Iaşi, secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal.

Păstrează actele îndeplinite de instanţă.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 10 martie 2020.