Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 566/2021 AI generated

Competence for civil transfer requests involving first-instance courts under Article 142(1) of the New Code of Civil Procedure

Case Number Decizia nr. 566/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (ICCJ) ruled that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and declined to hear the case, transferring the matter to the Craiova Court of Appeal. The dispute arose from a party's request to transfer a civil, administrative, and fiscal case pending before the Olt County Tribunal to a different court, alleging legitimate suspicion. Applying Article 142(1) of the New Code of Civil Procedure, which vests competence in the court of appeal for transfer requests involving courts of first instance within its circuit, the ICCJ determined that the procedural request fell under the exclusive competence of the Craiova Court of Appeal, citing related provisions on jurisdictional hierarchy in Articles 129, 131, and 132. The decision is final and without further appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 142 alin. (1) din Noul C. proc. civ, art. 132 alin. (1) şi alin. (3) din Noul C. proc. civ; Competence for civil transfer requests involving first-instance courts under Article 142(1) of the New Code of Civil Procedure: The dispute arose from a party's request to transfer a civil, administrative, and fiscal case pending before the Olt County Tribunal to a different court, alleging legitimate suspicion. Applying Article 142(1) of the New Code of Civil Procedure, which vests competence in the court of appeal for transfer requests involving courts of first instance within its circuit, the ICCJ determined that the procedural request fell under the exclusive competence of the Craiova Court of Appeal, citing related provisions on jurisdictional hierarchy in Articles 129, 131, and 132. The decision is final and without further appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of competence jurisdictional matters Civil Procedure Code grounds for cassation hearing of the parties judicial assistance in civil matters

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 142 alin. (1) din Noul C. proc. civ
Established the main ground for the decision by defining the competence of the court of appeal to handle transfer requests for cases heard in first instance.
art. 132 alin. (1) şi alin. (3) din Noul C. proc. civ
Applied as a procedural rule to determine the hierarchical jurisdiction and the power to decline competence.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1236/2016
Competence for civil case transfer requests: exclusive jurisdiction of the appellate court over first-instance tribunals
Decizia nr. 1726/2025
Competence for jurisdiction transfer requests from a tribunal to the appellate court under Article 142 Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 2034/2021
Competence for judicial transfer applications: Appellate vs. first-instance jurisdiction under the new Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 1103/2019
Jurisdictional competence for transfer of civil cases under Article 142 of the New Code of Civil Procedure
Decizia nr. 837/2017
Competence for transfer of civil case filed after 2013 under New Civil Procedure Code lies with Court of Appeals

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 142 alin. (1) din Noul C. proc. civ.

Established the main ground for the decision by defining the competence of the court of appeal to handle transfer requests for cases heard in first instance.

art. 132 alin. (1) şi alin. (3) din Noul C. proc. civ.

Applied as a procedural rule to determine the hierarchical jurisdiction and the power to decline competence.

art. 131 alin. (1) în referire la art. 129 alin. (2) pct. 2 din Noul C. proc. civ.

Cited to reinforce the procedural framework governing the specific court's jurisdictional limits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Şedinţa publică din data de 10 martie 2021

Constatând că se solicită strămutarea dosarului nr. x/2019 al Tribunalului Olt, secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, având ca obiect o acţiune formulată după data intrării în vigoare a Noului C. proc. civ., în considerarea dispoziţiilor art. 142 alin. (1) din acelaşi act normativ, potrivit cărora "cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motiv de bănuială legitimă este de competenţa curţii de apel, dacă instanţa de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripţia acesteia", raportat şi la dispoziţiile art. 132 alin. (1) şi alin. (3), art. 131 alin. (1) în referire la art. 129 alin. (2) pct. 2 din acelaşi cod, urmează să decline competenţa de soluţionare a cererii formulate de petentul A. privind strămutarea judecării cauzei ce formează obiectul dosarului nr. x/2019 al Tribunalului Olt, secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în favoarea instanţei competente, respectiv Curţii de Apel Craiova, motiv pentru care,

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Admite excepţia necompetenţei materiale a Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie.

Declină competenţa de soluţionare a cererii formulate de petentul A. privind strămutarea judecării cauzei ce formează obiectul dosarului nr. x/2019 al Tribunalului Olt, secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în favoarea Curţii de Apel Craiova.

Fără nicio cale de atac.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 10 martie 2021.