Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_181114 AI generated

Mandatory suspension of execution lasts until first-instance ruling; renewal on appeal inadmissible.

Case Number ICCJ_181114
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the referral from the Bucharest Tribunal and ruled, in a preliminary ruling procedure under Article 719(4)(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, that the effects of the mandatory suspension of enforcement proceedings last until the first-instance resolution of the enforcement challenge (contestația la executare); consequently, such a suspension request cannot be renewed on appeal against the enforcement court’s decision. The court rejected as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling on the scope of judicial review in assessing whether the mandatory suspension ground applies. The decision is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 719 alin. (4) pct. 1 din Codul de procedură civilă, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Mandatory suspension of execution lasts until first-instance ruling; renewal on appeal inadmissible: The court rejected as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling on the scope of judicial review in assessing whether the mandatory suspension ground applies. The decision is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement of ruling judicial review grounds for cassation preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision article of civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 719 alin. (4) pct. 1 din Codul de procedură civilă
Main ground for the preliminary ruling, establishing the interpretation of the mandatory suspension of enforcement.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Basis for declaring the ruling binding and obligatory.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 81/2021
High Court rules mandatory enforcement suspension lapses at first-instance ruling; renewal in appeal inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 2601/2005
Appeal against denial of execution suspension held inadmissible for lack of appellate remedy.
ICCJ_82698
Appeal against refusal to suspend execution during final appellate phase held inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 3238/2004
Appeal against suspension of civil execution proceedings dismissed; suspension for pending criminal prosecution affirmed
Decizia nr. 1962/2011
Suspension of execution denied for lack of reasoning; cassation granted and remanded for retrial.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 719 alin. (4) pct. 1 din Codul de procedură civilă

Main ground for the preliminary ruling, establishing the interpretation of the mandatory suspension of enforcement.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Basis for declaring the ruling binding and obligatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 81 Dosar nr. 2483/1/2021

Şedinţa din 6 decembrie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secţia a VI-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 10415/300/2019/a1, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea art. 719 alin. (4) pct. 1 din Codul de procedură civilă, efectele suspendării obligatorii a executării silite se produc până la data soluţionării în primă instanţă a contestaţiei la executare, iar o cerere având acest obiect nu poate fi reiterată în calea de atac exercitată împotriva hotărârii instanţei de executare.

Respinge ca inadmisibilă cererea de pronunţare a unei hotărâri prealabile, pentru interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 719 alin. (4) pct. 1 din Codul de procedură civilă, sub aspectul indicării limitelor analizei instanţei de judecată, în verificarea incidenţei cazului de suspendare obligatorie a executării silite.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 6 decembrie 2021.