Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_181112 AI generated

Provisional suspension request must be referred to enforcement court; general jurisdiction rules apply

Case Number ICCJ_181112
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the interest of the law filed by the Managing Board of the Bucharest Court of Appeal and established a mandatory, unitary interpretation of Articles 131(1), 714(1), and 719(7) of the Civil Procedure Code: a court seized with a request for provisional suspension of execution is obliged to verify its jurisdiction under the general rules, and if it finds it is not competent to hear the case on the merits, it must decline jurisdiction in favor of the enforcement court. The dispute concerned a procedural question of court jurisdiction over a provisional suspension request, resolved as a matter of uniform legal interpretation, with the decision being binding pursuant to Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Provisional suspension request must be referred to enforcement court; general jurisdiction rules apply: The dispute concerned a procedural question of court jurisdiction over a provisional suspension request, resolved as a matter of uniform legal interpretation, with the decision being binding pursuant to Article 517(4) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
provisional suspension enforcement procedural rules rule of law matter in dispute article of civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Used to declare the decision obligatory for all courts.
AI generated
ICCJ_185480
Competence verification and declination for provisional suspension of enforcement requests under general jurisdictional rules
Decizia nr. 816/2020
Jurisdiction for provisional suspension of forced execution: incidental nature of request attaches to the court competent for the main execution challenge based on debtor's seat
Decizia nr. 1639/2011
Competent court for provisional suspension of forced execution: jurisdiction of the court hearing the underlying execution objection
Decizia nr. 2309/2023
Conflict of jurisdiction resolved in favor of the enforcement court for provisional suspension of compulsory execution
Decizia nr. 4837/2018
Jurisdiction for provisional suspension of compulsory execution: incidental nature to objection to execution under Art. 719 C. proc. civ.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 131 alin. (1), art. 714 alin. (1) şi art. 719 alin. (7) din Codul de procedură civilă

Basis for establishing the unitary interpretation that the court must verify its competence and, if incompetent, decline in favor of the enforcement court.

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Used to declare the decision obligatory for all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 27 Dosar nr. 2618/1/2021

Şedinţa din 6 decembrie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Bucureşti și, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 131 alin. (1), art. 714 alin. (1) şi art. 719 alin. (7) din Codul de procedură civilă, instanţa învestită cu o cerere de suspendare provizorie a executării este obligată să îşi verifice competenţa potrivit dispoziţiilor generale, iar în cazul în care constată că nu este competentă să soluţioneze cauza pe fond, trebuie să pronunţe o soluţie de declinare a competenţei în favoarea instanţei de executare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 6 decembrie 2021.