Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1669/2019 AI generated

Negative jurisdictional conflict assigned to Bacău Tribunal over Bucharest Court of Appeal for administrative dispute

Case Number Decizia nr. 1669/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice resolved a negative jurisdictional conflict by assigning the case to the Bacău Tribunal, whose jurisdiction prevails over that of the Bucharest Court of Appeal for this administrative dispute. The case involves numerous plaintiffs, acting through a common representative, suing several courts and government ministries over matters related to judicial administration and finances. The decisive basis was procedural, applying Article 135(4) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure to determine which court has competence after conflicting rulings on jurisdiction between the two lower courts. The decision is final and definitive.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 135 alin. (4) din C. proc. civ, Art. 135 alin. (4) C. proc. civ; Negative jurisdictional conflict assigned to Bacău Tribunal over Bucharest Court of Appeal for administrative dispute: The case involves numerous plaintiffs, acting through a common representative, suing several courts and government ministries over matters related to judicial administration and finances. The decisive basis was procedural, applying Article 135(4) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure to determine which court has competence after conflicting rulings on jurisdiction between the two lower courts. The decision is final and definitive.

Keywords

AI generated
negative conflict of jurisdiction administration of justice civil litigation procedure e-government determination of territorial jurisdiction labor jurisdictional conflict

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 135 alin. (4) din C. proc. civ
În lipsa părţilor a căror citare nu a fost dispusă, în conformitate cu dispoziţiile art. 135 alin. (4) din C. proc. civ.
Art. 135 alin. (4) C. proc. civ
Applied as the legal basis for ruling on the negative conflict of competence without hearing the parties.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1351/2004
Jurisdiction conflict in enforcement challenge resolved; Bacău Court of Appeal assigned case.
Decizia nr. 4991/2009
Negative jurisdictional conflict resolved in favor of Bucharest Tribunal as enforcement court in challenge to administrative execution.
Decizia nr. 190/2015
Negative jurisdiction conflict resolved for central authority case assigned to Court of Appeal
Decizia nr. 2341/2015
Negative jurisdictional conflict between appellate courts over alternative territorial jurisdiction for claims against the State and central authorities under Articles 111 and 116 of the Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 93/2021
Negative jurisdictional conflict resolved: Bucharest Tribunal prevails over Cluj Tribunal in administrative claim by territorial unit.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 135 alin. (4) C. proc. civ.

Applied as the legal basis for ruling on the negative conflict of competence without hearing the parties.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare, în camera de consiliu, conflictul negativ de competenţă ivit între Tribunalului Bacău, secţia I civilă şi Curtea de Apel Bucureşti, secţia a VIII-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal în soluţionarea cauzei privind pe reclamanţii A., B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I., J., K., L., M., N., O., P., Q., R., S., T., U., V., W., X., Y., Z., AA., BB., CC., DD., EE., FF., GG., HH., II., JJ., KK., LL., MM., NN., OO., PP., QQ., RR., SS., TT., UU., VV., WW., XX., YY., ZZ., AAA., BBB., CCC., DDD., EEE., FFF., GGG., HHH., III., JJJ., KKK., LLL., MMM., NNN., OOO., PPP., QQQ., RRR., SSS., TTT., UUU., VVV., WWW., XXX., YYY., ZZZ., AAAA., BBBB., CCCC. - toţi prin mandatar VV. şi pe pârâţii Tribunalul Iaşi, Curtea De Apel Iaşi, Ministerul Justiţiei, Ministerul Finanţelor Publice -Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi prin Administraţia Judeţeană A Finanţelor Publice Bacău, Tribunalul Sibiu, Curtea De Apel Alba Iulia.

În lipsa părţilor a căror citare nu a fost dispusă, în conformitate cu dispoziţiile art. 135 alin. (4) din C. proc. civ.

ÎNALTA CURTE,

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Stabileşte competenţa de soluţionare a cauzei privind pe reclamanţii A., B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I., J., K., L., M., N., O., P., Q., R., S., T., U., V., W., X., Y., Z., AA., BB., CC., DD., EE., FF., GG., HH., II., JJ., KK., LL., MM., NN., OO., PP., QQ., RR., SS., TT., UU., VV., WW., XX., YY., ZZ., AAA., BBB., CCC., DDD., EEE., FFF., GGG., HHH., III., JJJ., KKK., LLL., MMM., NNN., OOO., PPP., QQQ., RRR., SSS., TTT., UUU., VVV., WWW., XXX., YYY., ZZZ., AAAA., BBBB., CCCC. - toţi prin mandatar VV. şi pe pârâţii Tribunalul Iaşi, Curtea De Apel Iaşi, Ministerul Justiţiei, Ministerul Finanţelor Publice -Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi prin Administraţia Judeţeană A Finanţelor Publice Bacău, Tribunalul Sibiu, Curtea De Apel Alba Iulia în favoarea Tribunalului Bacău.

Definitivă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 martie 2019.