Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_178652 AI generated

Pre-pension calculation inclusion of pre-2001 non-wage earnings proven by employer certificates under Law 263/2010

Case Number ICCJ_178652
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, in its composition for resolving issues of law, dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal. The dispute concerned the interpretation of Article 165(2) of Law No. 263/2010 regarding the unified public pension system, specifically whether additional earnings and bonuses realized prior to April 1, 2001, that were proven by employer certificates and had been included in the basis for social security contributions alongside wages recorded in workbooks, must be included in the pension benefit calculation. The court’s dismissal relies on the procedural requirements of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, meaning the lower court must resolve the factual and legal questions without a binding interpretation from the supreme court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 165 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Pre-pension calculation inclusion of pre-2001 non-wage earnings proven by employer certificates under Law 263/2010: The dispute concerned the interpretation of Article 165(2) of Law No. 263/2010 regarding the unified public pension system, specifically whether additional earnings and bonuses realized prior to April 1, 2001, that were proven by employer certificates and had been included in the basis for social security contributions alongside wages recorded in workbooks, must be included in the pension benefit calculation. The court’s dismissal relies on the procedural requirements of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, meaning the lower court must resolve the factual and legal questions without a binding interpretation from the supreme court.

Keywords

AI generated
pension calculation social security public-law benefit contribution period basis of calculation Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 165 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010
Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 165 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the final order to establish that the decision is binding.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the final order to establish that the decision is binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 71 Dosar nr. 1958/1/2021

Ședința din 11 octombrie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti - Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 26651/3/2020, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 165 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în sensul de a şti dacă la calculul drepturilor de pensie se au în vedere sporurile şi alte venituri suplimentare realizate anterior datei de 1 aprilie 2001, dovedite cu adeverinţe eliberate de unităţi, atunci când au fost încasate şi au făcut parte din baza de calcul al contribuţiilor de asigurări sociale pe lângă alte venituri decât salariile înscrise în carnetele de muncă, valorificate conform art. 165 alin. (1).

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 11 octombrie 2021.