Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_178650 AI generated

Recus in interest of the law on judicial fees for prosecutor dismissals due to perpetrator's death declared inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_178650
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed as inadmissible the appeal filed in the public interest by the leadership of a Court of Appeal, leaving the challenged interpretation without modification. The dispute concerned the uniform interpretation and application of specific provisions governing judicial timbres in criminal cases where the prosecutor dismisses the proceedings due to the death of the perpetrator. The decisive legal basis involved the provisions of Emergency Government Order No. 80/2013 concerning judicial timbres, specifically Article 29 paragraph (1) letter i), as amended, under the framework of mandatory appeals pursuant to Article 517 paragraph (4) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Recus in interest of the law on judicial fees for prosecutor dismissals due to perpetrator's death declared inadmissible: The dispute concerned the uniform interpretation and application of specific provisions governing judicial timbres in criminal cases where the prosecutor dismisses the proceedings due to the death of the perpetrator. The decisive legal basis involved the provisions of Emergency Government Order No. 80/2013 concerning judicial timbres, specifically Article 29 paragraph (1) letter i), as amended, under the framework of mandatory appeals pursuant to Article 517 paragraph (4) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial law deceased legal fees code of criminal procedure lack of prosecutorial standing uniform interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision regarding the appeal in the public interest.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision regarding the appeal in the public interest.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 22 Dosar nr. 2057/1/2021

Şedinţa din 11 octombrie 2021

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibil, recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Bucureşti cu privire la următoarea problemă de drept:

Interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. 29 alin. (1) lit. i) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 80/2013 privind taxele judiciare de timbru, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în cauzele în care ca urmare a decesului făptuitorului se pronunţă o soluţie de clasare de către procuror.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 11 octombrie 2021.