Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
967/17 AI generated

Constitutional Court admits appeal regarding non-conformity between normative criteria and applied decision in administrative case.

Case Number 967/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court admitted the appeal against the administrative court's decision, noting no grounds for dismissal under the relevant procedural law. The relator found no reason to reject the case despite the applicant's argument that the normative criteria used differed from those applied in the lower court's ruling. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal to proceed for a substantive review of the constitutional issues raised.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 78.º-A LTC; Art. 79.º, n.º 1 LTC: The Constitutional Court admits an appeal when the relator finds no procedural grounds for non-admission, even if the applicant argues a discrepancy between normative criteria and the applied decision.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Court admission of appeal procedural law normative criteria constitutional review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 78.º-A LTC
Art. 79.º, n.º 1 LTC
AI generated
476/15
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of coincidence between questioned interpretation and lower court ratio.
763/15
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of coincidence between the normative question and the applied criterion.
959/20
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses request for clarification of a lower court's ruling on normative interpretation.
702/22.0BESNT
Court dismisses appeal confirming lower court's correct application of performance-based point allocation rules.
504/07
Constitutional Court rejects request to reform judgment for alleged procedural omission regarding the object of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ACÓRDÃO N.º 563/2018

Processo n.º 967/17

2.ª Secção

Relatora: Conselheira Maria Clara Sottomayor

Acordam na 2.ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Notifique-se a recorrente para, querendo, se pronunciar sobre a eventualidade de não conhecimento do presente recurso por inutilidade, em virtude de o critério normativo sindicado não coincidir com aquele que foi aplicado na decisão recorrida. Prazo 10 dias.

Lisboa, 7 de novembro de 2018 – Maria Clara Sottomayor (com declaração)- Pedro Machete – Fernando Vaz Ventura – Catarina Sarmento e Castro - Manuel da Costa Andrade

DECLARAÇÃO DE VOTO

Por ora, consigna-se o seguinte:

Ao abrigo do disposto no artigo 78.º-A da LTC, a Relatora não divisou qualquer motivo para a não admissão do recurso, razão porque o admitiu, tendo sido produzidas alegações, ao abrigo do art. 79.º, n.º 1, da LTC, com respeito às questões de constitucionalidade suscitadas a propósito do acórdão do TCA Sul.

Maria Clara Sottomayor