Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
891/2013 AI generated

Portuguese Constitutional Court corrects a judgment's date due to a clerical writing error under civil procedure law.

Case Number 891/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional ordered a correction to the date of a previous ruling, changing January 14 to January 7, 2014. The court identified this discrepancy as a mere clerical writing error rather than a substantive flaw. Relying on the applicable civil procedure code, the court authorized the rectification to ensure the document accurately reflects the actual date of pronouncement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 614, paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Code; A clerical error in the date of a judicial decision constitutes a rectifiable mistake that does not invalidate the ruling, allowing the court to correct the date to match the actual pronouncement.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error judicial rectification date correction civil procedure code Tribunal Constitucional procedural error writing mistake

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 614, paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Code
AI generated
621/10
Constitutional Court corrects a clerical date error in a previous judgment under civil procedure rules.
190/15
Constitutional Court corrects a 2015 ruling's missing date to December 9, 2015, due to an evident clerical error.
1094/2015
Portuguese Constitutional Court corrects a clerical error in the date of a previous ruling from May to June 2016.
839/11.1TTPRT.P4
Portuguese court distinguishes procedural nullity from judgment error and limits employer arguments to dismissal decision facts.
706/2010
Constitutional Court corrects a prior ruling's date due to a clerical error under civil procedure rules.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ACÓRDÃO N.º 157/2014[1]

Processo n.º 891/2013

3ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Carlos Fernandes Cadilha

Acordam, em conferência, na 3ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

1. Pelo Acórdão n.º 12/2014, decidiu esta conferência, em 7 de janeiro do corrente ano (fls. 2781), indeferir a reclamação que a recorrente A. deduziu contra a decisão sumária proferida nos autos pelo relator.

Constata-se, agora, que, por lapso, o mencionado aresto está datado de 14 de janeiro de 2014, que não corresponde à data da sua efetiva prolação.

Trata-se de um mero erro de escrita, retificável (artigo 614.º, n.º 1, do Código de Processo Civil, na redação vigente, aplicável), pelo que cumpre proceder à sua retificação.

2. Pelo exposto, determina-se a retificação do Acórdão n.º 12/2014, proferido nos presentes autos, devendo passar a ler-se «7 de janeiro de 2014» onde se lê «14 de janeiro de 2014».

Notifique.

Anote no local próprio.

Lisboa, 13 de fevereiro de 2014. – Carlos Fernandes Cadilha – Maria José Rangel de Mesquita – Maria Lúcia Amaral.

[1] Retifica data do Acórdão 12/2014