Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
621/10 AI generated

Constitutional Court corrects a clerical date error in a previous judgment under civil procedure rules.

Case Number 621/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court corrected a clerical error regarding the date of a prior judgment by ordering the rectification of the written decision. The error involved a manifest lapse where the date '11/X/2011' was incorrectly entered instead of '12 de Outubro de 2011'. The court applied Article 667 of the Civil Procedure Code to fix this administrative mistake without re-evaluating the merits of the underlying case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 667 of the Civil Procedure Code; The Constitutional Court may correct manifest clerical errors in its own judgments to ensure the accuracy of the official record.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error rectification of judgment Civil Procedure Code manifest lapse Constitutional Court procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 667 of the Civil Procedure Code
artigo 667.º do Código de Processo Civil
11 360 e segs.) foi aposta a data de “11/X/2011”, quando deveria constar “12 de Outubro de 2011”, determina-se a rectificação do erro, ao abrigo do disposto no artigo 667.º do Código de Processo Civil.
AI generated
891/2013
Portuguese Constitutional Court corrects a judgment's date due to a clerical writing error under civil procedure law.
1094/2015
Portuguese Constitutional Court corrects a clerical error in the date of a previous ruling from May to June 2016.
190/15
Constitutional Court corrects a 2015 ruling's missing date to December 9, 2015, due to an evident clerical error.
217/2011
Constitutional Court corrects a manifest error regarding the decision date in a prior ruling under civil procedure law.
841/2021
Constitutional Court corrects prior judgment due to clerical errors in the date of the cited law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ACÓRDÃO N

ACÓRDÃO N.º 483/11

Processo n.º 621/10

3ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Vítor Gomes

Acordam na 3ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional

Verificando-se que, por manifesto lapso, no Acórdão n.º 480/2011 (fls. 11 360 e segs.) foi aposta a data de “11/X/2011”, quando deveria constar “12 de Outubro de 2011”, determina-se a rectificação do erro, ao abrigo do disposto no artigo 667.º do Código de Processo Civil.

Lisboa, 17 de Outubro de 2011.- Vítor Gomes – Maria Lúcia Amaral – Ana Maria Guerra Martins – Gil Galvão.