Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
442/04 AI generated

Constitutional Court corrects a prior ruling's omission of the justice fee amount due to a clerical error.

Case Number 442/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court rectified a previous decision that omitted the specific amount of the justice fee. The original ruling failed to state the monetary value of the tax despite the procedural requirement to do so. The court ordered the correction to include the fixed amount of 15 units of currency for the applicant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 667.º n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil; When a prior judgment omits a mandatory procedural element due to a clerical error, the court must rectify the omission to ensure the document reflects the complete legal determination.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction justice fee omission procedural rectification judgment amendment mandatory disclosure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 667.º n.º 1 do Código de Processo Civil
artigo 667º do Código de Processo Civil
1 do artigo 667º do Código de Processo Civil, rectifica-se o referido acórdão, devendo nele ficar a constar:
AI generated
TC_20030547
Constitutional Court corrects a prior ruling's omission of the court fee amount due to clerical error.
1408/20.0T8CSC.L1-A.S1
Portuguese court allows partial review of judgment for obvious error despite prior notification of opposing party.
972/08
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses request to reform excessive court costs fixed at 20 units.
TC_19990397
Constitutional Court orders payment of court costs to the losing party for omitted fees in a prior judgment.
151/2011
Constitutional Court rejects request to reduce court fees for a prisoner appealing a prior fee assessment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Acórdão 85/05

ACÓRDÃO N.º 85/05

Processo n.º 442/04

1.ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Pamplona de Oliveira

ACORDAM EM CONFERÊNCIA NO TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL

No Acórdão n.º 59/2005, de 2 de Fevereiro último, proferido no presente processo, na parte decisória referente à condenação em custas, omitiu-se, por mero lapso, o montante da taxa de justiça.

Assim, ao abrigo do disposto no n. 1 do artigo 667º do Código de Processo Civil, rectifica-se o referido acórdão, devendo nele ficar a constar:

"Custas pelo reclamante com a taxa de justiça que se fixa em 15 UC."

Lisboa, 16 de Fevereiro de 2005

Carlos Pamplona de Oliveira

Maria Helena Brito

Rui Manuel Moura Ramos