Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
TC_19980338 AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal against Supreme Court judgment due to lack of admissibility grounds.

Case Number TC_19980338
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court decided not to examine the appeal filed by M... against a Supreme Court judgment. The appellant argued for a specific legal outcome, but the court found no valid grounds to intervene. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without substantive review, and the original judgment stands.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 223.º da Constituição Portuguesa; Art. 52.º do Código de Processo Constitucional: The Constitutional Court will not examine appeals that lack admissibility or fail to meet the strict requirements for constitutional review.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal lack of admissibility Supreme Court judgment procedural dismissal constitutional review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 223.º da Constituição Portuguesa
Art. 52.º do Código de Processo Constitucional
AI generated
663/95
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal on jurisdictional voluntariness and non-justiciability of civil code articles.
451/97
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of direct constitutional question regarding blood test admissibility.
389/96
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for non-justiciability as it reviews acts, not norms.
TC_19970480
Constitutional court dismisses appeal for non-merits review due to lack of substantive examination.
643/95
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for failing to timely raise constitutional challenge regarding dismissal penalty.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Acórdão 338/98

ACÓRDÃO Nº 338/98

Proc. nº 634/97

2ª Secção

Relator: Cons. Sousa e Brito

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nestes autos vindos do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, em que é recorrente M... e recorrida a B..., Lda, pelo essencial das razões constantes da exposição de fls. 450 a 453, que mereceu a concordância da recorrida e que a resposta da recorrente em nada abala, decide-se não tomar conhecimento do recurso, fixando-se a taxa de justiça em oito unidades de conta, em que condena a recorrente.

Lisboa, 12 de Maio de 1998

José de Sousa e Brito

Guilherme da Fonseca

Maria dos Prazeres Beleza

Bravo Serra

Messias Bento

Luis Nunes de Almeida