Legislator Case Law & Legislation
601/95 AI generated

Constitutional court allows public hospital's insurance company claim regarding constitutional validity of compensation scheme.

Case Number 601/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court granted the appeal filed by the Public Prosecutor and the District Hospital of Tomar against a lower court decision. The court determined that the compensation scheme in question required a constitutional review which had not been properly addressed in the initial proceedings. Consequently, the lower court's ruling was revoked to ensure compliance with constitutional principles regarding the matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 220.º da CR; Art. 24.º da CR: The Constitutional Court must review the constitutionality of legal provisions affecting public entities when such review is raised, and lower court decisions must be revoked to align with constitutional determinations.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional validity review public hospital liability insurance company claim constitutional court appeal revocation of lower ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 220.º da CR
Art. 24.º da CR
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Acórdão 407/96

ACÓRDÃO 407/96

Processo nº 601/95

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Sousa e Brito

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional

Nestes autos vindos do Tribunal Judicial da comarca de Tomar, em que são recorrentes o Ministério Público e o Hos­pital Distrital de Tomar e recorrida a Companhia de Seguros A., pelos fundamentos constantes do Acórdão nº 760/95, publicado no Diário da República - II Série de 2 de Fevereiro de 1996, decide-se conceder provimento ao recurso e revogar-se o despacho recorrido, a fim de ser reformado em conformidade com o decidido quanto à questão de constitucionalidade, nesse Acórdão na 760/95.

Lisboa, 7 de Março de 1996

José de Sousa e Brito

Messias Bento

Bravo Serra

Guilherme da Fonseca

Luís Nunes de Almeida

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa