Legislator Case Law & Legislation
446/94 AI generated

Constitutional court allows public prosecution appeal regarding the constitutionality of a prior administrative decision.

Case Number 446/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court granted the public prosecution's appeal against an administrative decision, revoking the lower court's ruling. The Ministry of Public Prosecution challenged a decision based on the precedent set in Acórdão 681/95, arguing for constitutional review. The court followed the established precedent to reformulate the contested decision in accordance with the constitutional principles previously defined.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 220.º da CRP; Art. 52.º da CRP: When a prior decision violates constitutional principles established in binding precedent, the Constitutional Court must grant the appeal and reformulate the decision to ensure constitutional compliance.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional review public prosecution appeal administrative decision binding precedent constitutional compliance reformatio in peius constitutional court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 220.º da CRP
Art. 52.º da CRP

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Acórdão na 681/95 do Plenário

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Acórdão 399/96

ACÓRDÃO Nº 399/96

Processo nº 446/94

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Sousa e Brito

Nestes autos vindos do Tribunal Administrativo de Circulo de Lisboa, em que é recorrente o Ministério Público e recorrido A., seguindo o entendimento expresso no Acórdão na 681/95 do Plenário deste Tribunal, publicado no Diário da República - II Série de 30 de Janeiro de 1996, e sem prejuízo da opinião contrária do ora relator, concede-se provimento ao recurso, revogando-se a decisão recorrida, devendo esta ser reformulada em consonância com o decidido no citado Acórdão sobre a questão de constitucionalidade.

Lisboa, 7 de Março de 1996

José de Sousa e Brito

Messias Bento

Bravo Serra

Guilherme da Fonseca

Luís Nunes de Almeida

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa