Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
TC_19940624 AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses insurance company appeal without examining merits due to procedural defects.

Case Number TC_19940624
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declined to examine the insurance company's appeal against a Supreme Court judgment, ordering the company to pay court costs. The court determined the appeal lacked essential procedural requirements necessary for substantive review. Consequently, the request was rejected without addressing the underlying legal arguments presented by the parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 221.º n.º 1 da CRP; Art. 222.º da CRP: The Constitutional Court may decline to examine an appeal if it lacks the essential procedural requirements for admissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Court procedural admissibility insurance company appeal court costs Supreme Court judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 221.º n.º 1 da CRP
Art. 222.º da CRP
AI generated
TC_19940623
Constitutional court dismisses insurance company appeal against Supreme Court judgment on procedural grounds.
TC_19940592
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of jurisdiction over judicial decisions.
TC_19940547
Constitutional court dismisses insurance company's appeal as procedural prerequisites for the remedy were not met.
TC_19940589
Constitutional court dismisses appeal as lower court did not disregard a prior unconstitutionality declaration.
TC_19940554
Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of admissibility due to identical prior ruling on same issue.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Acórdão 624/94

ACÓRDÃO Nº 624/94

Procº nº 325/94

Rel. Cons. Alves Correia

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nos presentes autos, vindos do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, em que figuram como recorrente companhia de seguros A. e como recorrido B. (representado pelo Ministério Público), pelo essencial dos fundamentos da Exposição do Relator de fls. 98-101, decide-se não tomar conhecimento do recurso, condenando-se a recorrente em custas, fixando-se a taxa de justiça em 3 Unidades de Conta.

Lisboa, 22 de Novembro de 1994

Fernando Alves Correia

Guilherme da Fonseca

Messias Bento

José de Sousa e Brito

Bravo Serra

Luís Nunes de Almeida