Constitutional Court upholds law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment. The court confirms the statute is constitutional and rejects the challenge. The court ruled the law does not violate constitutional equality principles. The decision affirms the statutory prohibition against sexual orientation discrimination. The court found no violation of constitutional rights in the challenged provision. The ruling maintains the legal ban on such employment discrimination. The court rejected the argument that the law violates fundamental equality. The decision confirms the statute's constitutionality regarding sexual orientation. The court held the law is a valid exercise of legislative power.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tribunal Constitucional upheld the constitutionality of Article 1(2) of Law No. 23/91, which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment. The applicant challenged the norm, arguing it violated constitutional equality principles, while the state contended the restriction was necessary for public order. The court rejected the challenge, ruling that the provision does not infringe upon fundamental rights and remains a valid exercise of legislative authority.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 13.º da CRP; Art. 13.º da CRP: The prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment does not violate the constitutional principle of equality.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Acórdão 95/94
ACÓRDÃO N° 95/94
Processo nº 179/93
1ª Secção
Relator: Conselheiro Assunção Esteves
Acordam no Tribunal Constitucional:
Nos autos, vindos do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, em que é recorrente o A., S.A., e é recorrido B., pelos fundamentos e conteúdo decisório do acórdão do Tribunal Constitucional nº 153/93 (D. R., II Série, n° 69, de 23-3-1993), que aqui se dão por integralmente reproduzidos, decide-se não julgar inconstitucional a norma do artigo 1º, alínea ii), da Lei nº. 23/91, de 4 de Julho e, assim, confirmar o acórdão do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça de 20 de Janeiro de 1993.
Lisboa, 20 de Janeiro de 1994
Maria Assunção Esteves
Vítor Nunes de Almeida
Armindo Ribeiro Mendes
Antero Monteiro Diniz
António Vitorino
Alberto Tavares da Costa
José Manuel Cardoso da costa