Constitutional Court dismisses Public Prosecutor's appeal against a company's declaration of unconstitutional law. The court rejects the appeal, upholding the general binding force of the prior declaration of unconstitutionality. The court ruled that the appeal lacks merit given the established precedent. The decision affirms the binding nature of previous unconstitutionality declarations. The court maintains the general binding force of the prior ruling. The appeal is dismissed due to lack of merit. The court upholds the general binding force of the prior declaration. The decision confirms the binding nature of the previous ruling. The court rejects the appeal based on the established precedent.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court of Portugal dismissed the Public Prosecutor's appeal against a company regarding a declaration of unconstitutionality with general binding force. The Public Prosecutor argued against the application of the prior ruling, while the company maintained its validity. The court decided to reject the appeal because the prior declaration of unconstitutionality already established the general binding force required by law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 281.º, n.º 1, alínea b), da Constituição da República Portuguesa; Art. 281.º, n.º 2, da Constituição da República Portuguesa: The declaration of unconstitutionality with general binding force established in a prior decision remains valid and binding for all parties and authorities.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Acórdão 57/94
ACÓRDÃO N° 57/94
Processo nº 310/93
2ª Secção
Relator: Conselheiro Luís Nunes de Almeida
Acordam na 2ª secção do Tribunal Constitucional:
Nos presentes autos, em que é recorrente o Ministério Público e recorrida A., Lda., fazendo aplicação do caso da declaração de inconstitucionalidade com força obrigatória geral, constante do acórdão nº 805/93, publicado no Diário da Republica, I Série-A, de 4 de Janeiro de 1994, decide-se negar provimento ao recurso
Lisboa, 19 de Janeiro de 1994
Luís Nunes de Almeida
Guilherme da Fonseca
Messias Bento
José de Sousa e Brito
Bravo Serra
Fernando Alves Correia
José Manuel Cardoso da Costa