Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
766/93 AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses unconstitutionality challenge against labor code article due to lack of procedural standing.

Case Number 766/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declined to examine the unconstitutionality claim regarding Article 1 of Decree-Law 315/89. The Public Prosecutor challenged the new wording of Article 26 of the Labor Procedure Code, but the court found no valid grounds for review. Consequently, the request was not taken into consideration without a substantive ruling on the alleged constitutional violation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 220.º da Lei Orgânica do Tribunal Constitucional; The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine unconstitutionality claims when the requesting authority fails to meet procedural requirements for admissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Court jurisdiction Labor Procedure Code Unconstitutionality challenge Procedural admissibility Public Prosecutor standing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 220.º of the Organic Law of the Constitutional Court
AI generated
754/93
Constitutional court dismisses challenge to labor code article as it declines to examine the unconstitutionality claim.
76O/93
Portuguese Constitutional Court declares specific labor procedure code articles unconstitutional and dismisses the public prosecution appeal.
759/93
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses MP appeal against declaration of unconstitutionality of labor code article 26.1q. via Decree-Law 315/89.
89/15
Portuguese Constitutional Court rejects challenge to labor contract recognition laws, upholding constitutional principles.
TC_19940175
Portuguese Constitutional Court declares labor code amendment unconstitutional and dismisses the public prosecution appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Acórdão 49/94

ACÓRDÃO N° 49/94

Processo nº 766/93

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Alves Correia

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nos presentes autos, vindos do Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Moita, em que é recorrente o Ministério Público, tendo por objecto a questão de inconstitucionalidade da norma do artigo 1º do Decreto-Lei nº 315/89, de 21 de Setembro, na parte em que dá nova redacção ao artigo 26º do Código de Processo de Trabalho, pelos fundamentos da Exposição do relator de fls. 11 e 12, decide-se não tomar conhecimento do recurso.

Lisboa, 19 de Janeiro de 1994

Fernando Alves Correia

José de Sousa e Brito

Guilherme da Fonseca

Bravo Serra

Messias Bento

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa