Constitutional court upholds tax law article 9, rejecting unconstitutionality claim against tax authority. The court dismisses the challenge to the specific tax provision. The decision confirms the law's validity despite the taxpayer's arguments. The court rejects the constitutional challenge to the tax provision. The court rules the tax law is constitutional and valid. The court affirms the tax authority's right to enforce the law. The court upholds the tax law against the constitutional challenge. The court finds the tax provision does not violate constitutional rights. The court dismisses the unconstitutionality claim against the tax law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the unconstitutionality challenge against Article 9 of Decree-Law 154/91, which governs tax collection procedures. The Ministry of Finance argued the provision was necessary for effective tax administration, while the taxpayer contended it violated constitutional principles. The court ruled that the norm does not infringe fundamental rights and therefore upheld its validity, ordering the lower court to reform its decision accordingly.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.º da CRP; Art. 28.º da CRP: The Constitutional Court holds that a tax collection provision does not violate constitutional rights when it serves the legitimate aim of fiscal administration without disproportionate interference.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
ACÓRDÃO N.° 494/92
Processo n.º 427/92
2.ª Secção
Relator: Conselheiro Alves Correia
Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:
Nestes autos de recurso, vindos do Tribunal Tributário de 1ª Instância de Lisboa, sendo recorrente o Ministério Público e recorridos A., Lda., pelos fundamentos do acórdão n.º 331/92, publicado no Diário da República, II série, de 14 de Novembro de 1992.
Decide-se:
a) Não julgar inconstitucional a norma constante do n.º 1 do artigo 9.º do Decreto-Lei n.º 154/91, de 23 de Abril (por si ou conjugado com o n.º 2 do mesmo artigo);
b) Revogar a decisão recorrida e, em consequência, ordenar que a mesma seja reformada em conformidade com o aqui decidido sobre a questão de constitucionalidade.
Lisboa, 10 de Dezembro de 1992
Fernando Alves Correia
Luís Nunes de Almeida
Messias Bento
Bravo Serra
Mário de Brito
José de Sousa e Brito
José Manuel Cardoso da Costa