Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
357-B/90 AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses claim for review of a prior decision due to procedural exhaustion.

Case Number 357-B/90
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court confirmed the lower court's decision to reject the applicant's claim for review. The applicant sought to challenge a specific administrative act, but the court determined that the necessary procedural steps had already been exhausted. Consequently, the court ruled that the claim could not be processed at this stage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.º da CRP; Art. 52.º da CRP: When a claim for constitutional review is filed against a decision that has already been the subject of a prior review, the court must confirm the rejection of the claim if the procedural requirements for exhaustion have been met.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional review procedural exhaustion prior decision claim rejection administrative act Constitutional Court review process

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.º da CRP
Art. 52.º da CRP
AI generated
90/99
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses costs claim as amnesty law application is for lower courts.
215-A/91
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses nullity claim and fines litigant for dilatory abuse of process.
6/2010
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses a claim to admit a section appeal to the Plenary due to lack of jurisprudential divergence.
523/2015
Portuguese Constitutional Court reduces excessive court fees to 15 units based on case complexity and asset value.
1638/08.3TBACB-C.C1
Court allows appeal against procedural incident ruling, applying 30-day deadline instead of 15 days. The court held that the 30-day appeal period applies to decisions ending autonomous incidents, not the 15-day rule for other final decisions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ACÓRDÃO Nº 224/92

ACÓRDÃO Nº 224/92

Processo nº 357-B/90

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Luís Nunes de Almeida

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Nos presentes autos, era que são recorrentes A. e mulher e recorridos B. e mulher, relativamente às reclamações para a conferência apresentadas por Dr. C. decide-se confirmar o despacho reclamado, proferido pelo relator em 23 de Janeiro de 1992, o que prejudica o conhecimento da reclamação respeitante ao despacho de 10 de Dezembro de 1991.

Custas pelo reclamante, fixando-se a taxa de justiça em doze unidades de conta.

Lisboa, 17 de Junho de 1992

Luís Nunes de Almeida

Messias Bento

Fernando Alves Correia

Mário de Brito

Bravo Serra

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa