Constitutional court dismisses appeal after declaring the challenged administrative norm unconstitutional by general force. The court rejects the appeal because the norm was already declared unconstitutional with general binding force. The court applies the principle that a norm declared unconstitutional with general binding force cannot be applied. The court rules that the norm is void and the appeal must be rejected. The court holds that the norm is inapplicable due to its prior unconstitutional declaration. The court concludes that the appeal is inadmissible because the norm is already void. The court affirms that the norm cannot be applied after its unconstitutional declaration. The court states that the norm is invalid and the appeal must fail. The court determines that the norm is unenforceable due to its constitutional violation. The court finds that the norm is legally ineffective and the appeal is rejected.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Public Prosecutor against a judge's refusal to apply a specific administrative norm. The court noted that it had previously declared this same norm unconstitutional with general binding force in a prior decision. Consequently, the court rejected the appeal because the norm was already legally void and could not be applied.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 28.º n.º 2 da Constituição da República Portuguesa; Art. 282.º do Código de Processo Constitucional: When a norm is declared unconstitutional with general binding force, any subsequent appeal challenging its application must be dismissed as the norm is already void.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
ACÓRDÃO Nº 145/91
ACÓRDÃO Nº 145/91
Processo n.º 342/90
2ª Secção
Relator: Conselheiro Alves Correia
Acordam na 2.ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:
Nestes autos, em que é recorrente o Ministério Público e recorrido A., o Mmº Juiz a quo recusou aplicação a norma constante da alínea b) do n.º 3 da Portaria nº 760/85, de 4 de Outubro.
Desta decisão foi interposto recurso para o Tribunal Constitucional.
Entretanto, este Tribunal, pelo Acórdão nº 61/91 (publicado no Diário da República, I Série-A, de 1 de Abril de 1991) declarou, com força obrigatória geral, a inconstitucionalidade da referida norma.
Nestes termos, e em aplicação da mencionada declaração de inconstitucionalidade, decide-se negar provimento ao recurso.
Lisboa, 24 de Abril de 1991.
Fernando Alves Correia
Messias Bento
Mário de Brito
Luís Nunes de Almeida
José de Sousa e Brito
Bravo Serra
José Manuel Cardoso da Costa