Legislator Case Law & Legislation
026486 AI generated

Portuguese court holds secret voting incompatible with required deliberation justification for public function appointments.

Case Number 026486
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the municipal chamber's appeal regarding a public function appointment decision. The chamber argued that secret voting was legally required, while the applicant contended the lack of written justification violated statutory mandates. The court ruled that secret voting is incompatible with the obligation to provide reasoned deliberations, rendering the decision invalid.

Legislator headnote

Official

CAMARA MUNICIPAL DELIBERAÇÃO CONCURSO DE PROVIMENTO LISTA DE GRADUAÇÃO ESCRUTINIO SECRETO FUNDAMENTAÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
secret voting incompatibility reasoned deliberation requirement public function appointment municipal chamber decision administrative justification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
DL 256-A/77 de 1977, Art. 1
Constitution of Portugal, Art. 268, n.º 2

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Supreme Administrative Court, 1983/02/10

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER - FUNÇÃO PUBL ESTATUTARIO. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 256-A/77 DE 1977/06/17 ART1. CONST82 ART268 N2. [JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA DE 1983/02/10. [1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 2827 [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 89 [APENDICE] DR [DATA DE ENTRADA] 10/27/1988 [DATA DO APENDICE] 11/15/1994 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00029487 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119890426026486 [OBJECTO] SENT TAC LISBOA. [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] CM DE ALCOBAÇA [RECORRIDO 1] CAMPOS , JOÃO [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/BA23ADF229E7373C802568FC0037DC41?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO I - A votação por escrutinio secreto não e incompativel com a fundamentação da respectiva deliberação.

II - A alteração, por uma Camara Municipal, da lista de graduação dos candidatos a determinado concurso de provimento carece de fundamentação.