Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
01204/14 AI generated

Exceptional review of TCA decision dismissed for failure to identify specific nullity vices within the action's caducity period.

Case Number 01204/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court rejected the exceptional review of the TCA South's decision, which had dismissed the request for suspension of effectiveness due to the caducity of the right of action. The applicant failed to identify the specific legal defect constituting the alleged nullity of the unchallenged act within the required three-month period. Consequently, the court held that the exceptional review could not be admitted without a concrete identification of the vices generating nullity.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE REVISTA EXCEPCIONAL SUSPENSÃO DE EFICÁCIA CADUCIDADE DO DIREITO DE ACÇÃO APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR

Keywords

AI generated
exceptional review caducity of action nullity vices suspension of effectiveness administrative procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 223.º do Código de Processo Administrativo
Art. 224.º do Código de Processo Administrativo

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P18265

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA12014112001204

[RECORRENTE] A...

[RECORRIDO 1] SEF

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/145EAF86FDF61DE880257DA10056786B?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não é de admitir a revista excepcional de decisão do TCA Sul que, justificada e de modo juridicamente plausível, julgou improcedente o pedido de suspensão de eficácia, por caducidade do direito de acção, por não ter sido impugnado acto, objecto do pedido de suspensão, no prazo de 3 meses, sem que o recorrente identifique o concreto vício que, a seu ver, é gerador de nulidade.