Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V KO 45/18 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses retrial request as obviously unfounded due to lack of new evidence or procedural error.

Case Number V KO 45/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland rejected the defendant's request for a retrial based on Article 545 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The applicant argued for a new trial, but the court found the request obviously unfounded without specific grounds. Consequently, the request was dismissed because it lacked the necessary legal basis for reopening the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.; The court may reject a retrial request if it is obviously unfounded, requiring the applicant to demonstrate specific grounds such as new evidence or procedural violations.

Keywords

AI generated
retrial request obviously unfounded Code of Criminal Procedure Supreme Court procedural error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.
akt II AKa […]/18), na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł: odmówić przyjęcia wniosku wobec jego oczywistej bezzasadności.
art. 545 § 3 k.p.k
akt II AKa […]/18), na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V KO 45/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 5 lipca 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Eugeniusz Wildowicz w sprawie Ł.D. po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu w dniu 5 lipca 2018 r., wniosku skazanego o wznowienie postępowania w sprawie Sądu Okręgowego w S. (sygn. akt III K […]/16, zakończonej prawomocnie wyrokiem Sądu Apelacyjnego w S. (sygn. akt II AKa […]/18), na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł: odmówić przyjęcia wniosku wobec jego oczywistej bezzasadności.