Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V KO 31/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against criminal court's finding of procedural error in sentencing decision.

Case Number V KO 31/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision rejecting the appeal filed by a judge regarding a procedural violation. The appellant argued that the sentencing court erred in its application of specific legal provisions during the proceedings. The court determined that the alleged procedural defect did not justify overturning the original ruling or requiring a new trial.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 400 § 1 k.k.; Art. 401 § 1 k.k.: A procedural error in sentencing proceedings does not constitute grounds for appeal if it does not affect the substantive outcome or violate fundamental rights.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal procedure procedural error sentencing appeal judicial review Supreme Court criminal law procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 400 § 1 k.k.
Art. 401 § 1 k.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V KO 31/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 maja 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Andrzej Tomczyk w sprawie R. O. ‎po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu‎w dniu 23 maja 2022 r.,‎odwołania wniesionego przez sędziego Sądu Rejonowego w S. na postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w P.‎z dnia 6 listopada 2020 r., sygn. akt V Kz (…), w przedmiocie wytknięcia uchybienia, utrzymuje w mocy zaskarżone postanowienie. UZASADNIENIE