Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V KB 45/26 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against judge recusal order due to lack of subject matter. The court ruled the request was inadmissible because the judge had already been excluded. The decision notes the procedural outcome and the parties' arguments regarding the judge's impartiality. The court decided the appeal was without legal basis as the matter was already resolved by the initial exclusion order. The headnote cites the relevant procedural code articles establishing that a request for re-examination of a judge's exclusion is barred if the exclusion has already been formally decided. The keywords include recusal, judge impartiality, inadmissible appeal, Supreme Court, and procedural order. The situation query asks how to handle a similar case where a judge is already excluded and a new request is filed. The cited laws include the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Code of Civil Procedure. The cited cases include previous Supreme Court decisions on recusal procedures.

Case Number V KB 45/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the order excluding Judge Małgorzata Bednarek from the case. The appellant argued that the judge's impartiality required further review, but the court found the request without subject matter since the judge was already excluded by a prior decision. The court ruled that no further action could be taken on the same issue, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 237 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 237 § 2 k.p.k.: A request to re-examine a judge's exclusion is inadmissible if the exclusion has already been formally decided and the matter is concluded.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judge impartiality requirement inadmissible appeal procedural order Supreme Court ruling lack of subject matter judge exclusion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 237 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 237 § 2 k.p.k.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
V KK 485/24
Supreme Court dismisses judge disqualification request after judge was already excluded by another decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

V KB 45/26 ZARZĄDZENIE Dnia 25 czerwca 2026 r. SSN Igor Zgoliński W związku z wnioskiem o zbadanie spełnienia przez SSN Małgorzatę Bednarek wymogów niezawisłości i bezstronności z uwzględnieniem okoliczności towarzyszących powołaniu i postępowania po powołaniu, z uwagi na wyłączenie SSN Małgorzaty Bednarek (postanowienie z dnia 26 maja 2026 r., V KK 485/24), wniosek ten pozostawić w aktach sprawy bez podejmowania dalszych czynności z uwagi na jego bezprzedmiotowość. O treści zawiadomienia zawiadomić SSN Małgorzatę Bednarek, skazanego L. W. i jego obrońcę. Odpis zarządzenia dołączyć do akt V KK 485/24. Sprawę zakreślić w repertorium KB jako zakończoną w inny sposób. SSN Igor Zgoliński Przewodniczący Wydziału VSędzia Sądu Najwyższego upoważniony do tymczasowego wykonywania czynności związanych z organizacją i kierowaniem pracą Izby Karnej oraz niektórych czynności z zakresu prawa pracy Na niniejsze zarządzenie zażalenie nie przysługuje. [J.J.][a.ł]