Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 678/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 678/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involves a claim for payment where the defendant argues the lower court erred in its legal assessment. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination rather than issuing a final ruling on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a violation of the law or failed to examine a crucial issue, necessitating remittal for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance violation of law remit for retrial civil procedure code debt dispute appellate judgment legal error review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 678/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 18 maja 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Iwona Koper w sprawie z powództwa S. Ś.‎przeciwko M. M.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 18 maja 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 20 maja 2015 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.