Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 677/14 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine ownership claim against county road authority.

Case Number V CSK 677/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by T. B. against the lower court's decision on ownership. The case involves a dispute between T. B. and the County K. Road Authority regarding the acquisition of land through prescription. The court decided to refer the matter for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision requires further examination of the case facts or legal issues.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance ownership by prescription road authority dispute Supreme Court review civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 677/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 12 czerwca 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Bogumiła Ustjanicz w sprawie z wniosku B. B. i T. B.‎przy uczestnictwie Powiatu K. - Zarządu Dróg Powiatowych w K.‎o stwierdzenie zasiedzenia,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 12 czerwca 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy T. B.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Ś.‎z dnia 26 czerwca 2014 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE