Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 668/14 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a payment dispute.

Case Number V CSK 668/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerns a payment claim where the defendant argues the lower court erred in its legal application. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination rather than issuing a final ruling on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court committed a violation of the law or failed to apply the law correctly, necessitating remittal for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance violation of law improper application of law remittal for retrial payment dispute civil procedure code Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 668/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 11 czerwca 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosław Bączyk w sprawie z powództwa W. […] Sp. z o.o. w O.‎przeciwko B. […] S.A. w T.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 11 czerwca 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 22 maja 2014 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE