Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 665/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal regarding inheritance dispute involving multiple heirs and a prosecutor. The court accepts the appeal for further review of the lower court's decision.

Case Number V CSK 665/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by participant D. M. against the district court's ruling on the inheritance dispute. The case involves multiple heirs, including W. J., R. L., and Z. L., alongside the Prosecutor's Office acting in the matter. The court decided to admit the appeal for examination rather than dismissing it outright, indicating a need for further legal review of the procedural or substantive issues raised.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision violates the law or if there are significant doubts regarding the correctness of the decision, even in inheritance proceedings involving the prosecutor's office.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance inheritance dispute multiple heirs prosecutor participation Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 665/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 6 maja 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z wniosku W. J.‎przy uczestnictwie R. L., Z. L., D. M. i Prokuratora Prokuratury Rejonowej w W.‎o dział spadku,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 6 maja 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej uczestniczki postępowania D. M. od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 20 marca 2015 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [l.n]