Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 620/18 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects request to supplement judgment regarding enforcement title invalidation procedure.

Case Number V CSK 620/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the defendant's request to supplement its November 2020 judgment concerning the invalidation of an enforcement title. The defendant argued that the original decision lacked necessary details to execute the ruling against the plaintiff. The court declined to amend the judgment, stating that the existing decision was sufficiently clear and that the request did not meet the statutory requirements for supplementation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.: The court may supplement a judgment only if the original decision is unclear or incomplete regarding the subject matter of the dispute, and the request must be based on facts established in the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
supplementing judgment enforcement title invalidation procedure civil proceedings clearness of decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 620/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 19 lipca 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marian Kocon (przewodniczący, sprawozdawca)‎SSN Maria Szulc‎SSN Roman Trzaskowski w sprawie z powództwa E. G.‎przeciwko D. N.‎o pozbawienie wykonalności tytułu wykonawczego,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 19 lipca 2021,‎wniosku pełnomocnika z urzędu pozwanej D. N.‎o uzupełnienie wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 listopada 2020 r. sygn. akt V CSK 620/18, odrzuca wniosek.