Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 59/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a payment dispute.

Case Number V CSK 59/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerns a payment claim between two companies, with the defendant arguing that the lower court erred in its legal application. The court decided to refer the case back for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a material error in the application of substantive or procedural law, necessitating a remittal for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance material error in law payment dispute between companies remittal for retrial civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 59/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 czerwca 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Katarzyna Tyczka-Rote w sprawie z powództwa T. Sp. z o.o. w G.‎przeciwko "W." Sp. z o.o. w Ż.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 czerwca 2018 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 26 września 2017 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.