Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 579/13 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the statute of limitations for acquiring ownership has expired.

Case Number V CSK 579/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the applicant against the Regional Court's decision on the statute of limitations. The applicant argued that the limitation period for acquiring ownership had expired, while the opposing parties contended otherwise based on the timeline of possession and legal claims. The court decided to admit the appeal for examination to determine if the statutory requirements for acquisitive prescription were met in this specific instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 145 § 1 k.c.; Art. 146 § 1 k.c.: The court established that the expiration of the limitation period for acquiring ownership must be verified by examining the continuity of possession and the absence of legal interruptions.

Keywords

AI generated
acquisitive prescription statute of limitations ownership transfer possession continuity cassation appeal civil law property rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 145 § 1 k.c.
Art. 146 § 1 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 579/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 czerwca 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Antoni Górski w sprawie z wniosku Gminy O.‎przy uczestnictwie Skarbu Państwa-Starosty O., Prokuratura Rejonowego w O., K. L., U. L. i B. L.‎o stwierdzenie zasiedzenia,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 13 czerwca 2014 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawczyni od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w O.‎z dnia 24 stycznia 2013 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE