Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 551/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal to establish necessary easement despite opposing party's objections.

Case Number V CSK 551/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by A. W. and C. L. to establish a necessary road easement. The lower court had previously rejected the request based on objections raised by S. B. and M. M. regarding the necessity and legal basis of the easement. Consequently, the case was remanded for further proceedings to resolve the substantive dispute on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 469 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 470 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision violates the law or fails to address essential arguments, thereby remanding the case for a new decision on the merits of the easement claim.

Keywords

AI generated
necessary easement road easement cassation appeal Supreme Court property rights civil procedure remand for trial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 469 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 470 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 551/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 11 września 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak w sprawie z wniosku A. W. i C. L.‎przy uczestnictwie (…)‎o ustanowienie służebności drogi koniecznej,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 11 września 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej uczestników S. B. i M. M.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w B.‎z dnia 29 maja 2018 r., sygn. akt II Ca (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE