Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 502/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation complaints against a civil judgment regarding a payment dispute between an individual and a city.

Case Number V CSK 502/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted both cassation complaints filed by the plaintiff and the Ombudsman for the Rights of Citizens against the appellate court's judgment. The case involves a civil dispute where the plaintiff sought payment from an individual and the City of T. The court decided to proceed with the review of the lower court's ruling on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation complaints if the lower court's judgment violates the law or fails to apply the law correctly.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation procedure civil litigation payment dispute appellate review legal error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 502/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 18 lutego 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak w sprawie z powództwa A. M.‎przeciwko M. S. i Miastu T.‎przy udziale Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 18 lutego 2020 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych powoda i Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 8 lutego 2019 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE