Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 50/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law regarding the claim for payment.

Case Number V CSK 50/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in its assessment of the claim for payment and order. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the correct application of legal provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court accepts a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court correctly applied the law or violated procedural rules.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal payment order civil procedure legal error Supreme Court appellate review procedural violation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 50/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 10 czerwca 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Bogumiła Ustjanicz w sprawie z powództwa Z. R.‎przeciwko W. W. i W. Sp. z o.o. w W.‎o nakazanie i zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 10 czerwca 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 6 czerwca 2018 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE