Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 460/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether civil court properly assessed evidence in a custody dispute.

Case Number V CSK 460/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal to review the lower court's handling of evidence regarding child custody. The applicant argued that the regional court failed to adequately evaluate witness testimony and documentary proof presented during the proceedings. The court decided to admit the appeal because the lower judgment contained significant gaps in its reasoning that required further examination by a higher panel.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 ust. 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 386 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may admit a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment contains a significant error in the assessment of evidence or reasoning that affects the outcome of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admissibility assessment of evidence child custody dispute significant error in judgment Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 ust. 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 386 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 460/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 stycznia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Pietrzykowski w sprawie z wniosku J. R.‎przy uczestnictwie J. M.‎o zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 23 stycznia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawczyni od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 29 października 2018 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE