Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 454/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if a partner's signature on a company document binds the company.

Case Number V CSK 454/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant partner against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involves whether a specific signature placed on a company document by one partner legally binds the entire limited partnership company. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to clarify the legal effect of that specific signature.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine a crucial issue of law or fact necessary for the resolution of the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
limited partnership partner liability company signature cassation appeal binding effect legal representation corporate documents

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 454/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 2 marca 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa A. W.‎przeciwko I. S. A. Sp. komandytowo-akcyjnej we W.i G. S.A. w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 2 marca 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej I. S. A. 2 Sp. komandytowo-akcyjna w W.od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 20 marca 2019 r., sygn. akt I AGa (…) przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE