Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 425/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number V CSK 425/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the bank's refusal to transfer funds constituted unjust enrichment, while the bank contended the funds were lawfully withheld. The court decided to remand the case for further examination to clarify the specific circumstances of the funds' origin and the legal basis for the bank's retention.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 405 k.c.; Art. 406 k.c.: The court established that a cassation appeal regarding unjust enrichment claims is admissible when the lower court failed to examine the essential facts determining the existence of the enrichment without legal basis.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment cassation appeal bank refusal civil procedure remand for facts

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 405 k.c.
Art. 406 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 425/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 30 kwietnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Monika Koba w sprawie z powództwa K. K.‎przeciwko (…) Bank (…) S.A. z siedzibą w W. i Spółdzielni Mieszkaniowej Lokatorsko-Własnościowej "[…]." w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 30 kwietnia 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 12 marca 2020 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.