Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 417/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether adverse possession claim is barred by statute of limitations.

Case Number V CSK 417/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by M. R. K. and W. R. against a lower court's decision denying their adverse possession claim. The applicants argued that the statutory period for adverse possession had expired, while the opposing party contended the claim remained valid based on continuous possession. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the limitation period was properly calculated.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o własnościach wieczystych; Ustawa o ograniczeniach czasowych; The court must examine whether the statutory period for adverse possession has expired before dismissing the claim.

Keywords

AI generated
adverse possession statute of limitations ownership acquisition cassation appeal possession duration

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 417/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 stycznia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marcin Krajewski w sprawie z wniosku M. R. K. i W. R.‎przy uczestnictwie Gminy W.‎o stwierdzenie zasiedzenia,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 23 stycznia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawców od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 6 marca 2019 r., sygn. akt II Ca (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE