Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 393/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 393/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiffs argued that the lower court erred in its assessment of the debt obligations, while the defendant contended the decision was legally sound. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the legal application was flawed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to apply the law correctly or if the judgment is based on a violation of the law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance application of law error civil procedure code debt dispute Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 393/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 9 stycznia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Tomasz Szanciło w sprawie z powództwa J. T. i K. T.‎przeciwko G.S. A. w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 9 stycznia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 28 lutego 2019 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…) przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE