Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 393/17 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine ownership via adverse possession against opposing party's objection.

Case Number V CSK 393/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by M.G. against the lower court's decision denying ownership via adverse possession. The applicant argued that continuous possession met legal requirements, while the opposing party contested the duration and continuity of the claim. The court decided to remand the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 100 k.c.; Art. 101 k.c.: The court accepts a cassation appeal regarding adverse possession claims when procedural issues or factual disputes require further clarification before a final judgment on ownership acquisition.

Keywords

AI generated
adverse possession ownership acquisition cassation appeal civil procedure possession duration property rights Supreme Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 100 k.c.
Art. 101 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 393/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 stycznia 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z wniosku R. F. i M. G.‎przy uczestnictwie M. C., J. D., J. G., J. S., R. Ż., X. Y., J. K., W. S., A. W., E. S., E. P. i M. S.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 stycznia 2018 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy M.G.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w K.‎z dnia 25 sierpnia 2016 r., sygn. akt IV Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.