Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 388/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal against civil judgment regarding bank payment dispute between Bank S.A. and defendants.

Case Number V CSK 388/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendants against the Second Instance Court's judgment. The dispute involved Bank S.A. in Warsaw seeking payment from the defendants, J. G. and A.G., following a civil proceeding. The court decided to admit the appeal for further examination based on the specific grounds raised in the cassation petition.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment violates the law or contains a significant error in the application of law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal civil procedure payment dispute bank liability Supreme Court legal error admission of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 388/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 27 maja 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marian Kocon w sprawie z powództwa (…) Bank S.A. w W.‎przeciwko J. G. i A.G.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 27 maja 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanych od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 8 lutego 2019 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.